Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carolina Meligeni Alves vs Jelena Simic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Alves vs Simic analysis and find out who is favored!
Carolina Meligeni Alves vs Jelena Simic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Alves 1 - 0 Simic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Alves has won 46.73% of points on their second serve, while Simic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Alves, in recent form, has won 59.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Simic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Alves has saved 56.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Simic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Alves has won 54.24% of matches played (W/L 32/ 27), with Simic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Alves has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 337/ 227), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Simic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 34/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Alves has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Simic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Alves winning 1 times and Simic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Alves winning 2 and Simic winning 1. The last match between Alves and Simic was at the Hammamet, 18-12-2016, Final, Clay with Carolina Meligeni Alves getting the victory 6-0 4-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Alves and Simic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Alves winning 1 times and Simic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Alves winning 0, and Simic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Alves has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.36 while Simic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Alves has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Simic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Alves has converted 49.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Simic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
404
Rank
165
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
433
High
32
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (380-281)
Career Total W/L
58% (225-165)
64% (28-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$125,563
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Carolina Meligeni Alves vs Jelena Simic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Alves VS Simic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Carolina Meligeni Alves | Jelena Simic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:40:0 | 2:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (68/90) | 60% (61/102) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (33/68) | 54% (33/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 32% (13/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (9/19) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (56/102) | 49% (44/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Jelena Simic
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carolina Meligeni Alves | Jelena Simic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (28/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (64/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (515/395) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (24/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 134 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.55 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1978/3065) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1219/1978) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (508/1087) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (203/411) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1424/2943) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (20/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 89% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (28/44) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Carolina Meligeni Alves Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Rodriguez
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
88%
(
68 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
9
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
64%
(
88 of
137)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
12
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
63 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Melisa Ercan
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vivian Wolff
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daria Lodikova
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Miriana Tona
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
14%
(
3 of
21)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Yuliana Monroy
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Fernanda Labrana
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Simic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Breckova
Player
Jelena Simic
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
13%
(
2 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Simic
Player
Hx Izabella Tan
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Carrillo Marin
Player
Jelena Simic
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Melanie Klaffner
Player
Jelena Simic
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Jelena Simic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jelena Simic
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Julia Payola
Player
Jelena Simic
46%
(
52 of
114)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
1
Aces
0
18
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
50%
(
31 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelena Simic
Player
Elaine Genovese
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alves Vs Simic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Alves are available here and Simic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
